Oct 02 2005
preaching teaching and speaching
I’ve been reading and thinking about the proclamation part of what we do as a part of our worship in most churches. That sermon, message talk thing. Why do we calling it preaching or teaching or speaking? Do we need preachers any more? Can we get along fine with just telling our stories to each other? Is preaching in the Bible? Is preaching the same as teaching.
I’ve always had a hard time seeing what I share in worship teaching. I don’t fell that primarily trying to teach anything. Instead I hope to proclaim the great story in a way that people see themselves in story and find that the story is their own. SO what tis it that we are dong this part of worship is it preaching teaching or speaching?
I’ve just been reading Pagitt new book preaching re-imagined. In it pagitt suggests that preaching as we currently practice it (speaching he calls it) is a less that effective way of communicating the good news story. Speaching he says limits the seat of God’s authority to one.
Speaching set the story of god in a prefabricated context where it all makes sense from the perspective of the person speaking
I think that accurately described much of Anglo preaching which has a focus on transmitting information. However “good” preaching in the Afro Christian church is as interactive as Pagitt calls for, eliciting responses and comment from those engaged. Though I’m not sure this is what Pagitt is re-imagining. Scott McKnight has a good conversation going on Pagitt at Jesus Creed
This raises the question what exactly is preaching for? Are we showing off our communication skills? Telling truth? Proclaiming the good news? what? is the ultimate goal for this activity in worship to empower the priesthood of all believers? Do we need to take our cue form the church in Waterford England where the heart of worship was written and stop all preaching and just let worshipers bring a sacrifice of praise? Kester Brewin at The Complex Christ: asks Can Anyone Tell Me What Preaching Is For?
I’m a preacher. A reluctant introverted preaching (who is working against my personality tendencies whenever I get up to preach) but a preacher nonetheless so I’m am probably biased when I say, ”I think God can speak through anyone, but some are particularly called to share the story through the ministry of preaching.”
If our preaching became more opened ended and less propositional more expreintial stroy telling then I think we would be more engaging and interactive. If we saw preaching as illuminating elements of the great story for others to enter into that story so we all could find ourselves there then the seat of authority would rest only with God and preaching has great value. I think real dialogue about God’s message can follow from this kind of approach not just dialogue born out of our own thinking.
Ultimately is it a false dichotomy to think that it either everybody talks (good ) or one person talks (bad). Or maybe there are different ways of sharing the story. Two weeks ago had a tag team message at Mosaic Life where two people with very different ways of approaching telling the story shared in the preaching. The process was the mosteffective ways I’ve participated in preaching. I guess I’d like to get beyond the either or and do both/and.
Popularity: 9% [?]























